We give B description or a variauon-perturbalion approach IO calculaling intermolecular pok.nlrals that possess a syslematic cancellation ol errors. An important consequence is the posabihty or uslog integrals over AOs that arc quile approximate.
A model-based approach to the calculation of global warming potentials (GWP)
β Scribed by J. Rotmans; M. G. J. Den Elzen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 816 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0899-8418
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The Global Warming Potential (GWP) of greenhouse gas emissions can be defined as a greenhouse pendant to the Ozone Depleting Potential (ODP). Global Warming Potentials are calculated for the most important greenhouse gases (CO~2~, CH~4~, CO, N~2~O, CFCβ11, CFCβ12, CFCβ13, CFCβ14, CFCβ113, CFCβ114, CFCβ115, CFCβ116, CF~3~Br, CCl~4~, CH~3~CCl~3~, and HCFCβ22) and eight potential CFC substitutes using the integrated climate assessment model IMAGE. Two different methods are presented for the calculation of GWP values using IMAGE: one that generates equivalent pulses for all greenhouse gases, and an iterative traceβback method which calculates the different pulses required to achieve an identical global temperature increase for all greenhouse gases. In addition the influence of the emission scenario used is tested when determining GWPs; it is demonstrated that GWPs are indeed scenarioβdependent, so the choice of the underlying emission scenario is important. Finally, the GWPs calculated using these methods are compared with GWPs that have been published previously. It appears that our GWP estimates are substantially higher than the IPCC estimates, which can be explained by the fact that our carbon cycle model has a balanced global carbon budget. This results in lower projections of future atmospheric carbon dioxide compared with the IPCC projections.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A new approach to the computation of molecular electrostatic potentials based on the AM1 wave function is described. In contrast to the prevailing philosophy, but consistent with the underlying NDDO approximation, no deorthogonalization of the wave function is carried out. The integrals required for