๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal gastrectomy for cancer

โœ Scribed by Luigi Zorcolo; Alan S. Rosman; Michele Pisano; Francesca Marcon; Angelo Restivo; Giuseppe R. Nigri; Alessandro Fancellu; Marcovalerio Melis

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
306 KB
Volume
104
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-4790

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Short-term outcomes from a prospective r
Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer
โœ J. Neudecker; F. Klein; R. Bittner; T. Carus; A. Stroux; Professor W. Schwenk ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 146 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background Randomized trials in low-risk populations have failed to show any benefit for laparoscopic compared with open colorectal resection in terms of morbidity. Furthermore, it is not known whether laparoscopic colorectal resection would yield advantages if randomization were re

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled t
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh
โœ S. S. Forbes; C. Eskicioglu; R. S. McLeod; A. Okrainec ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 129 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair has been reported in a number of small trials to have equivalent or superior outcomes to open repair. ## Methods Randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open incisional or ventral hernia repair with mesh