In traditional mathematical models of argumentation an argument often consists of a chain of rules or reasons, beginning with premisses and leading to a conclusion that is endorsed by the party that put forward the argument. In informal reasoning, however, one often encounters a specific class of co
β¦ LIBER β¦
A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation
β Scribed by Martin W. A. Caminada; Dov M. Gabbay
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 380 KB
- Volume
- 93
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0039-3215
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A formal account of Socratic-style argum
β
Martin W.A. Caminada
π
Article
π
2008
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 252 KB
Formal Logic vs. Philosophical Argument
β
Dragan Stoianovici
π
Article
π
2009
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 130 KB
Argumentation and formal logic in philos
π
Article
π
1989
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 669 KB
Philosophers do not usually regard their arguments as informal. Yet despite the a priori appearance of many philosophical arguments, it is dangerous to formalize them. Formalization shifts the issue from what the argument attempts to establish or refute to its premises. I illustrate this danger in t
Logical Modes of Attack in Argumentation
β
Dov M. Gabbay; Artur S. dβAvila Garcez
π
Article
π
2009
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 323 KB
A formalization of elenctic argumentatio
β
Sergio Galvan
π
Article
π
1995
π
Springer
π
English
β 804 KB
A revised βLogical Connectionβ Argument
β
Robert C. Richardson
π
Article
π
1975
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 190 KB