A Life Cycle Comparison of Alternative Cheese Packages
✍ Scribed by Müfide Banar; Zerrin Çokaygil
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 589 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1863-0650
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) between three different cheese packages (P1: completely polypropylene (PP), P2: tin and polyethylene (PE), and P3: carton and PE) has been carried out for the production, distribution and waste disposal (100% landfill) phase. A package for 1 kg of cheese was selected as the functional unit. SimaPro7 software (PRèConsultants, The Netherlands) was used for the LCA study. The EcoIndicator 99 method was selected for comparison of the packages. The comparisons show that the total environmental performance of the cheese package types in order from worst to best is P2, P1, and P3. This conclusion was supported by a sensitivity analysis, which was conducted by using different impact assessment methods.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Emerging environmental pressures over the last two decades have urged the development of sophisticated tools to evaluate the environmental burdens and impacts of products and processes. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was ®rst used some 30 years ago and has now developed into a valuable tool for busines
## Abstract Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is generally considered one of the best environmental management tools that can be used to compare alternative eco‐performances of recycling or disposal systems. It considers the environment as a whole, including indirect releases, energy and mate
## Abstract Electric utilities are enforced to control trustworthily total lifetime costs caused by their network components without jeopardizing the reliability and security of the network. New distribution planning methods and procedures are needed in order to meet the expectations and performanc