A meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method is applied to solve dynamic plate bending problems described by the Reissner-Mindlin theory. Both harmonic and impact loads are considered. The Laplace-transform is used to eliminate the time dependence of the variables for transient problems. A weak fo
A hybrid meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method for unbounded domains
✍ Scribed by Andrew J. Deeks; Charles E. Augarde
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 474 KB
- Volume
- 196
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0045-7825
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Meshless methods have gained popularity in recent years. However, like the finite element method, they do not handle unbounded domains well. Coupling with other techniques more suited to performing this task is problematic, since nodal values on the boundary are fictitious rather than actual. The scaled boundary finite element method is a semi-analytical approach to computational mechanics ideally suited to modelling unbounded domains. Recently a meshless version of the scaled boundary method based on the local Petrov-Galerkin approach has been developed. This paper couples the meshless scaled boundary method, used to model the far field, with conventional meshless local Petrov-Galerkin modelling of the near field. The coupling method is general, and could be applied to other techniques of modelling the far field, such as the infinite element method.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A coupled finite element (FE) and meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method for analyzing two-dimensional potential problems is presented in this paper. A transition region is created between the FE and MLPG regions. The transition region blends the trial and test functions of the FE and MLPG reg
A technique based on the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method is developed and applied to the derivation of an absorbing boundary condition for the analysis of transient wave propagation. The condition is exact in that only discretization error is involved. Furthermore, the computational cos