A group majority voting model of public good provision
โ Scribed by R. B. Morton
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 775 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0176-1714
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A model of public good provision by majority rule selection incorporating the behavior of rational group voting is formulated. Two probability maximizing candidates are assumed. If voters are risk averse in public sector preferences, then a unique symmetric (both candidates offering identical platforms) equilibrium exists. If certain additional conditions hold on the group cost functions of political support, this equilibrium will lie at the public good level which maximizes the sum of voter utility. It is further demonstrated that it is unlikely for those conditions to be satisfied and therefore more realistic asymmetric equilibria with positive voter turnout is predicted: * This paper is based on an essay of a dissertation submitted to Tulane University under the supervision and invaluable assistance of Steven Slutsky, Jonathan Hamilton, and William Oakland. The advice of Gerald Whitney, Michael Johnson, and an anonymous referee is also gratefully acknowledged: All errors remain the authors.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In an article in this journal, Martin McGuire [4] presented a public goods model based upon voluntary contributions and Cournot interaction. His model indicated that the aggregate provision of the public good could be either positively or negatively related to group size; the exact relationship depe
This paper focuses on one possible measure for the severity of the problems of inefficiency, suboptimality and the Prisoner's Dilemma in voluntary public-good provision. The proposed measure is the probability of the emergence of the respective problem in an impartial environment where all feasible