𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A generalization of the ray-chaudhuri-wilson theorem

✍ Scribed by Hunter S. Snevily


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
161 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
1063-8539

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Let K = {Itl,. . . , k,} and L ={I1,. . . , Z,} be two sets of non-negative integers and assume ki > l j for every i , j . Let T be an L-intersecting family of subsets of a set of n elements. Assume the size of every set in T is a number from K. We conjecture that 1 ' f l 5 (: ). We prove that our conjecturer is true for any K. (with min ki 2 s) when L = (0, 1, ..., s -l}. We also show that for any K and any L , (with min ki > max l j ) , 5 ( " T I ) -k (:I;) + _._ 4-( , ! &: ,

) .


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A generalization of TurΓ‘n's theorem
✍ Benny Sudakov; Tibor SzabΓ³; H. Van Vu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 94 KB

## Abstract In this paper, we obtain an asymptotic generalization of TurΓ‘n's theorem. We prove that if all the non‐trivial eigenvalues of a __d__‐regular graph __G__ on __n__ vertices are sufficiently small, then the largest __K__~__t__~‐free subgraph of __G__ contains approximately (__t__β€‰βˆ’β€‰2)/(__

A Generalization of a Theorem of Dirac
✍ Tristan Denley; Haidong Wu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 85 KB

In this paper, we give a generalization of a well-known result of Dirac that given any k vertices in a k-connected graph where k 2, there is a circuit containing all of them. We also generalize a result of Ha ggkvist and Thomassen. Our main result partially answers an open matroid question of Oxley.

On a generalization of Rubin's theorem
✍ Dmitry A. Shabanov πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 89 KB

The work is devoted to the calculation of asymptotic value of the choice number of the complete r-partite graph K m \* r = K m,. ..,m with equal part size m. We obtained the asymptotics in the case ln r = o(ln m). The proof generalizes the classical result of A.L. Rubin for the case r = 2.