𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A general method of parameterizing the big-leaf model to predict the dry-canopy evaporation rate of individual coniferous forest stands

✍ Scribed by Hikaru Komatsu


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
235 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6087

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

This study proposes a general method of parameterizing the big‐leaf model that is applicable to estimation of daytime dry‐canopy evaporation (hereafter, evaporation) rates of coniferous forest stands without observed flux data. The method considers variation in the reference value of surface conductance G~s~ between individual stands by incorporating a relationship between canopy height and reference G~s~ values reported by Komatsu (2003c) [Hydrological Processes 17: 2503–2512]. However, the method does not consider variation in modifier functions of G~s~ and in aerodynamic conductance G~a~ between individual stands.

We examined the validity of the method based on daytime evaporation rate data for 26 coniferous stands. The method showed greater predictability than another method that ignores variation in reference G~s~ values between individual stands. This illustrates the validity of considering variation in reference G~s~ values between individual stands. Model predictability was not enhanced by considering variation in modifier functions of G~s~ and G~a~ between individual stands. This illustrates the validity of ignoring variation in modifier functions of G~s~ and G~a~ between individual stands.

The method is applicable to stands with projected LAI ≥ 3·0 and canopy height <c. 30 m. The method can result in errors when applied outside these limitations. Regardless, the method should be valuable for estimating daytime evaporation rates of coniferous stands, as many stands fall within these limitations. The method is applicable to evaporation rate estimates in growing seasons without soil water stress when dry‐canopy evaporation significantly affects the forest water cycle. At this stage, the method can result in errors when applied outside this limitation. However, the method should be valuable as a basis for developing a more comprehensive method applicable outside this limitation. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.