๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A general approximate technique for the finite element shakedown and limit analysis of axisymmetrical shells. Part 1: Theory and fundamental relations

โœ Scribed by Jose Ricardo Queiroz Franco; Alan R. S. Ponter


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
180 KB
Volume
40
Category
Article
ISSN
0029-5981

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper describes the theory and the fundamental relations for the development of a displacement formulation for the finite element shakedown and limit analysis of axi-symmetrical shells. The material is assumed to be elastic-perfectly plastic. The technique is developed based upon an upper bound approach using a reformulated kinematic shakedown theorem for a shell with piecewise linear yield conditions. The solution of the problem is obtained by discretizing the shell into finite elements. A consistent relationship between the kinematically admissible velocity fields and the pure plastic strain rate fields during collapse needs to be enforced. Such requirement is satisfied by using the theory of conjugate approximations to minimize the residual of the two independent descriptions of the plastic strain increments. The discretized problem is then reduced to a minimization problem and solved by linear programming. The class of displacement fields chosen assumes plastic hinge lines forming at nodal points and only meridional and circumferential plastic strains occurring within the elements with no change in curvature. Examples of the application of the method are given in the accompanying paper.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A general approximate technique for the
โœ Jose Ricardo Queiroz Franco; Alan R. S. Ponter ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 387 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The shakedown theory and basic relations to develop an upper bound technique for the analysis of thin axisymmetric shells has been represented in Part 1 of this paper. Here numerical solutions consisting of the shakedown or limit load and the corresponding collapse mechanism are compared with other