𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A Gelfand-Phillips Property with Respect to the Weak Topology

✍ Scribed by Denny H. Leung


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
328 KB
Volume
149
Category
Article
ISSN
0025-584X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We consider a Gelfand‐Phillips type property for the weak topology. The main results that we obtain are (1) for certain Banach spaces, E^˜^~ϵ~ F inherits this property from E and F, and (2) the spaces L^p^(μ, E) have this property when E does.

A subset A of a Banach space E is a limited set if every (bounded linear) operator T:E → c~0~ maps A onto a relatively compact subset of c~0~. The Banach space E has the Gelfand‐Phillips property if every limited set is relatively compact. In this note, we study the analogous notions set in the weak topology. Thus we say that AE is a Grothendieck set if every T: E → c~0~ maps A onto a relatively weakly compact set; and E is said to have the weak type GP property if every Grothendieck set in E is relatively weakly compact. In the papers [3, 4 and 6], it is shown among other results that the ϵ‐tensor product E and the spaces L^p^(μ, E) inherit the Gelfand‐Phillips property from E and F. In this paper, we study the same questions for the weak type GP property.

It is easily verified that continuous linear images of Grothendieck sets are Grothendieck and that the weak type GP property is inherited by subspaces. Among the spaces with the weak type GP property one easily finds the separable spaces, and more generally, spaces with a weak* sequentially compact dual ball. Also, C(K) spaces where K is (DCSC) are weak type GP (see [3] and the discussion before Corollary 4 below). A Grothendieck space (a Banach space whose unit ball is a Grothendieck set) has the weak type GP if and only if it is reflexive.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A weakness of the capability approach wi
✍ MOZAFFAR QIZILBASH 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB 👁 2 views

This paper is concerned with certain ways in which people adjust to deprivation. Capability egalitarians cite cases where people adjust to deprivation by adapting their preferences to discredit welfarist egalitarianism. I argue that this phenomenon is an example of a larger set of cases, where peopl