𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A fuzzy preference relation in the vector maximum problem

✍ Scribed by Stefan Chanas; Bronisław Florkiewicz


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
434 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0377-2217

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A new approach to the compromise solution concept for the vector maximum problem is considered. It is assumed in this approach that one may specify a fuzzy preference relation in the alternative space reflecting the objective functions and the decision maker's preferences. The maximal nondominated alternative for this relation is proposed as a compromise solution to the initial problem. Properties of the compromise solution are analysed under different assumptions concerning the initial problem as well as the accepted fuzzy preference relation.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Some problems on the definition of fuzzy
✍ J. Montero; J. Tejada 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 399 KB

In this paper we deal with decision-making problems over an unfirzxy set of alternatives. On one hand, we propose the problem of finding a max-min transitive relation as near as possible to a given initial preference relation, under the least-squares criterion and such that it does not introduce dee

A note on the reciprocity in the aggrega
✍ F. Chiclana; F. Herrera; E. Herrera-Viedma; L. Martı́nez 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 217 KB

In (Fuzzy Sets and Systems 97 (1998) 33), we presented a fuzzy multipurpose decision making model integrating di erent preference representations based on additive reciprocal fuzzy preference relations. The main aim of this paper is to complete the decision model studying conditions under which reci

On the redundancy of convex non-decreasi
✍ D. J. White 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB 👁 1 views

In this note we show that auxiliary functions used for generating vector maxima and which are based upon convex non-decreasing transformation functions of the objective functions cannot perform better than the standard nonnegative weighting factor method.