๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A framework for engineering metaphor at the user interface

โœ Scribed by J.L Alty; R.P Knott; B Anderson; M Smyth


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
167 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
0953-5438

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Interface metaphors facilitate the learning of new computer systems by supporting the transformation of existing knowledge in order to improve the comprehension of novel situations. However, there is very little guidance for software designers on how to select, implement and evaluate interface metaphors. This paper, which is based upon extensive work in developing metaphors for telecommunications systems, provides a framework for software designers who wish to exploit the use of interface metaphors. The paper proposes a set of six design steps, to provide designers with a practical approach to the application of metaphor in the design of interactive systems. An explanation of the activities required in each step is given and justiยฎed from experience gained in developing a number of interface metaphors. A pragmatic model of the use of metaphor in human centred system design is introduced, and a technique for eliciting metaphor characteristics is developed from ethnomethodology. The approach has been discussed with software designers at two workshops, and the ยฎnal content has been inยฏuenced by their input.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Unifying Reference Framework for multi
โœ Calvary, Gaรซlle (author);Coutaz, Joรซlle (author);Thevenin, David (author);Limbou ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier ๐ŸŒ English โš– 694 KB

This paper describes a framework that serves as a reference for classifying user interfaces supporting multiple targets, or multiple contexts of use in the field of context-aware computing. In this framework, a context of use is decomposed into three facets: the end users of the interactive system,

The user action framework: a reliable fo
โœ TERENCE S. ANDRE; H. REX HARTSON; STEVEN M. BELZ; FAITH A. MCCREARY ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 531 KB

Although various methods exist for performing usability evaluation, they lack a systematic framework for guiding and structuring the assessment and reporting activities. Consequently, analysis and reporting of usability data are ad hoc and do not live up to their potential in cost e!ectiveness, and