A framework for cost-effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data
✍ Scribed by Anthony O'Hagan; John W. Stevens
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 262 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9230
- DOI
- 10.1002/hec.617
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
We present a general Bayesian framework for cost‐effectiveness analysis (CEA) from clinical trial data. This framework allows for very flexible modelling of both cost and efficacy related trial data. A common CEA technique is established for this wide class of models through linking mean efficacy and mean cost to the parameters of any given model.
Examples are given in which efficacy may be measured as a continuous, binary, ordinal or time‐to‐event outcome, and in which costs are modelled as distributed normally, log‐normally, as a mixture or non‐parametrically.
A case study is presented, illustrating the methodology and illuminating the role of prior information. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The cost‐effectiveness of new health care technologies is conditional upon who receives __what__ therapy and under __what__ circumstances. Understanding this heterogeneity in cost‐effectiveness, health care payers often limit reimbursement of therapies to a more restrictive sub‐group of
It is becoming increasingly more common for a randomized controlled trial of a new therapy to include a prospective economic evaluation. The advantage of such trial-based cost-effectiveness is that conventional principles of statistical inference can be used to quantify uncertainty in the estimate o
Cost-effectiveness ratios usually appear as point estimates without confidence intervals, since the numerator and denominator are both stochastic and one cannot estimate the variance of the estimator exactly. The recent literature, however, stresses the importance of presenting confidence intervals