A sudden and puzzling leak in the astronauts' oxygen supply forced NASA to delay the launch of Space Shuttle Endeavour, which was scheduled for early November 2002, according to a report in the US press. With just two hours remaining in the countdown, NASA called off the flight to the International
A flare deflagration incident at Rohm and Haas
β Scribed by Vipul M. Desai
- Book ID
- 105358793
- Publisher
- American Institute of Chemical Engineers
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 203 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1066-8527
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
One of the flares at Rohm & Haas plant experienced a series of three consecutive deflagrations resulting in severe damage to the flare water seal flame arrestor. The deflagrations occurred during process start up after a complete unit shutdown. This incident caused no personal injuries or offβsite impact. The incident was investigated using MCSOII (Multiple Cause System Oriented Incident Investigation) process.
The root cause for the event was inadvertent addition of hot air to the flare. The hot air flow was such that the methaneβair mixture in the flare was combustible (about 11% methane). In addition, hot air raised the combustible methaneβair mixture temperature to about 300Β°C. The flashback velocity from the flare tip is a strong function of process gas temperature and is much higher at elevated temperatures. Thus, the downward flame front velocity was greater than the upward methaneβair mixture velocity and caused flashback. The first flashback possibly damaged the water seal such that the water seal flame arrestor lost its functionality and the connector pipe, which brings gases from knockout drum through the water seal, was open (See Figure 1). The next two flashbacks resulted in deflagrations in the knockout durm through the open connector pipe. Thus, the key recommendation to avoid a similar incident is to eliminate hot air flow to the flare.
The key learning from the above incident is that flashbacks are possible when process gas is hot. We would like to extend this learning to other flares and urge a further study of all flares for possible flashback scenarios. A key action point from this incident is to perform a HAZOP on other possibilities of FLASHBACK in the flare. This will be done by performing flashback calculations on all possible flaring scenarios in the flare.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES