๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A field comparison of two methods for measuring DCPA soil evaporation rates

โœ Scribed by Michael S. Majewski; Michael M. Mcchesney; James N. Seiber

Book ID
112088075
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
820 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
0730-7268

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

A comparison of field methods for measur
A comparison of field methods for measuring soil carbon dioxide evolution: Experiments and simulation
โœ J. I. Freijer; W. Bouten ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 648 KB

Three widely used methods for measuring total soil CO 2 evolution are evaluated, including the dynamic CO 2 absorption method, the static CO 2 absorption method and the closed chamber method. The study covers laboratory experiments, numerical experiments with a simulation model and field measurement

A comparison of two direct-observation m
A comparison of two direct-observation methods for measuring daytime safety belt use
โœ David W. Eby; Fredrick M. Streff; Carl Christoff ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 512 KB

This study compared two methods for measuring front-outboard shoulder-belt use: looking into vehicles when they stopped at a traffic control device (SVDO) and looking into vehicles as they traveled along a traffic corridor (MVDO). The reliability of the latter method has been questioned and certain