𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A family of power-divergence diagnostics for goodness-of-fit

✍ Scribed by Cinzia Carota


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
French
Weight
902 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0319-5724

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On Burbea–Rao Divergence Based Goodness-
✍ M.C. Pardo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 170 KB

This paper investigates a new family of statistics based on Burbea Rao divergence for testing goodness-of-fit. Under the simple and composite null hypotheses the asymptotic distribution of these tests is shown to be chi-squared. For composite hypothesis, the unspecified parameters are estimated by m

Comparing Power Behaviours for Some Good
✍ Dr. H. B. Lawal πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 447 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Suvmary This paper is concerned with the power behaviour of four goodness-of-fit test statistics in sparse multinomials with k cells. Most previous work has been concerned only with both Pearson's Xz and the likelihood ratio test statistics. We consider in this study, two additional test statis

A COMPARISON OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FO
✍ D. W. HOSMER; T. HOSMER; S. LE CESSIE; S. LEMESHOW πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 271 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

Recent work has shown that there may be disadvantages in the use of the chi-square-like goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model proposed by Hosmer and Lemeshow that use fixed groups of the estimated probabilities. A particular concern with these grouping strategies based on estimated

A Comparison Between Several Goodness of
✍ Dr. N. J. D. Nagelkerke; J. Oosting; A. A. M. Hart πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 215 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

A comparison is made between two approaches to testing goodness of fit of Cox's regression model for survival data. The first approach is based on the inclusion of time dependent covariates, whereas the second one is based on the autocovariance of successive contributions to the derivative of the lo