Depression is the most common psychiatric disorder among the elderly and in old age may interact with emotional and cognitive functioning. Depression in old age has been shown to be associated with degenerative changes in the brain. It is, therefore, important that in this patient population antidep
A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of paroxetine and imipramine in the treatment of depression with dementia
โ Scribed by Cornelius L. E. Katona; Brian N. Hunter; Julia Bray
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 150 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Objectives. To compare the ecacy of paroxetine and imipramine prospectively in patients with coexisting depression and dementia.
Methods. An 8-week, double-blind, parallel group trial comparing paroxetine 20ยฑ40 mg/day with imipramine 50ยฑ100 mg/day in 198 patients aged 60 years or over with a MontgomeryยฑAsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score 5 20 and a Folstein mini-mental state evaluation score of 17ยฑ23 points after a 3-to 7-day placebo run-in period.
Results. Both paroxetine and imipramine reduced the MADRS and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severityof-illness and global improvement scores at weeks 2, 4, 8 and at endpoint, with no signiยฎcant dierences between treatment groups at any timepoint (MADRS, p 5 0.368; cgi, p 5 0.286). There was a statistically signiยฎcant dierence in favour of paroxetine at both the week 4 and week 8 timepoints (analysis of variance, p 4 0.049) in the Cornell scale for depression in dementia: at endpoint there was no signiยฎcant dierence between treatments ( p 0.103). Treatmentemergent adverse experiences were reported by 51.5% (51/99) of patients treated with paroxetine and 50.5% (50/99) of patients treated with imipramine. Anticholinergic adverse experiences (paroxetine 6.1%; imipramine 13.1%) and serious non-fatal adverse experiences (paroxetine 4.0%; imipramine 8.1%) were reported by more patients in the imipramine group than in the paroxetine group.
Conclusions. Paroxetine and imipramine were both eective in the treatment of depression in elderly subjects with co-existing dementia, and no signiยฎcant dierences were detected between the groups. There were trends suggesting that paroxetine was better tolerated than imipramine in terms of anticholinergic adverse experiences and serious non-fatal adverse experiences.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In a double-blind multicentre trial in patients with major depression, the ecacy and the tolerability of sertraline were compared to those of imipramine, during an 8-week acute treatment phase followed by a 16-week continuation treatment phase in treatment responders. A total of 104 patients who met
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of fluoxetine and desipramine in depressed, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women. Although difficulty in the recruitment and retention of participants led to insufficient power to det
in terminal cancer patients to compare tropisetron (TRO), metoclopramide (MET),
This double-blind randomized pilot study aimed to compare the ecacy and the tolerability of pirlindole (150ยฑ225 mg/day), a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, and mianserin (60ยฑ90 mg/day) in the treatment of major depression. Forty patients were included in the trial (20 pirlindole and 20 m