✦ LIBER ✦

A double-blind comparison of the effectiveness of azathioprine and sulfasalazine in idiopathic proctocolitis

✍ Scribed by Caprilli, R. ;Carratu, R. ;Babbini, M.

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of cyclosporin A and azathiop

✍ K. Krüger; M. Schattenkirchner 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 765 KB

Double-blind comparison of terfenadine,

✍ GRANT, J; BERNSTEIN, D; BUCKLEY, C; CHU, T; FOX, R; ROCKLIN, R; SCHOENWETTER, W; 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 636 KB

A double-blind controlled trial of azath

✍ G.M. Murphy; P.D.L. Maurice; P.G. Norris; J.L.M. Hawk 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 74 KB

A randomised double-blind trial of cyclo

✍ Ahern, M. J. ;Harrison, W. ;Hollingsworth, P. ;Bradley, J. ;Laing, B. ;Bayliss, 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 568 KB

Comparison of Cyclosporine (CsA) and Aza

✍ Mathieu, A.; Fantini, F; Corvetta, A.; Todesco, S.; Pasero, G.; Pala, R.; Zeni, 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB

A long-term double-blind controlled stud

✍ Minderhoud, J.M.; Prange, A.J.A.; Luyckx, G.J. 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 304 KB