✦ LIBER ✦

A discussion of the paper “direct tensile tests on prismatic concrete specimens” by P.E. Petersson

✍ Scribed by R.J. Gray

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1981
Tongue: English
Weight: 62 KB
Volume: 11
Category: Article
ISSN: 0008-8846
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(81)90047-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Direct tensile tests on prismatic concre

Direct tensile tests on prismatic concrete specimens

✍ P.E. Petersson 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 308 KB

A reply to a discussion by R.J. Gray of

A reply to a discussion by R.J. Gray of “direct tensile tests on prismatic concrete specimens”

✍ P.E. Petersson 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 70 KB

A discussion of the papers: Fracture ene

A discussion of the papers: Fracture energy of concrete practical performance and experimental results, method of determination by P. E. Petersson

✍ S. Somayaji 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 165 KB

A discussion of the paper “mechanism of

A discussion of the paper “mechanism of sulfate attack on portland cement concrete - another look” by P.K. Mehta

✍ S. Chatterji 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 70 KB

In his paper Prof. Mehta has commented that the effect of gypsum formation on the sulfate attack has not been properly explained in the literature. As far as I know, Lea was the first to propose that gypsum formation may cause damage to Portland cement concrete and explained this on the assumption o

A discussion on the paper “evaluation of

A discussion on the paper “evaluation of miniature rock prism test for determining the potential alkali-expansivity of aggregates” by P E Grattan-Bellew

✍ D.A. St John 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 154 KB

A discussion of the paper “a field metho

A discussion of the paper “a field method for measuring the chloride content of concrete” by R.E. Weyers, S.E. Herald, M.A. Feeney, S.F. How Lum, C. Bader and P.D. Cady

✍ William G. Hime 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB

Unfortunately, the studies and conclusions presented in the paper were made by engineers and not by chemists. As a result, neither the errors made nor the potential for error when applying the method to a wide variety of aggregates were recognized by the authors.