A Dictionary of Austronesian Monosyllabic Roots (Submorphemes)
β Scribed by Robert Blust
- Publisher
- De Gruyter Mouton
- Year
- 2022
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 290
- Series
- Pacific Linguistics [PL]; 652
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This book documents an understudied phenomenon in Austronesian languages, namely the existence of recurrent submorphemic sound-meaning associations of the general form -CVC.
It fills a critical gap in scholarship on these languages by bringing together a large body of data in one place, and by discussing some of the theoretical issues that arise in analyzing this data. Following an introduction which presents the topic, it includes a critical review of the relevant literature over the past century, and discussions of the following: 1. problems in finding the root (the "needle in the haystack" problem), 2. root ambiguity, 3. controls on chance as an interfering factor, 4. unrecognized morphology as a possible factor in duplicating evidence, 5. the shape/structure of the root, 6. referents of roots, 7. the origin of roots, 8. the problem of distinguishing false cognates produced by convergence in root-bearing morphemes from legitimate comparisons resulting from divergent descent, and 9. the problem of explaining how submorphemes are transmitted across generations of speakers independently of the morphemes that host them. The remainder of the book consists of a list of sources for the 197 languages from which data is drawn, followed by the roots with supporting evidence, a short appendix, and references.
β¦ Table of Contents
Contents
List of abbreviations
Introduction
1 Literature review
2 Issues relating to the root in Austronesian languages
3 Summary of the data
4 Sources for the data
5 The Data
6 Appendices
References
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Since the pioneering analyses of Renward Brandstetter (1860β1942) a quasi-morphological element called the βrootβ has been recognized in Austronesian linguistics. This monograph confronts many of the methodological and substantive issues raised but never fully resolved by Brandstetter. In an effort
<p><span>There are no direct records of the original Indo-European speech. By comparing the vocabularies of its various descendants, however, it is possible to reconstruct the basic Indo-European roots with considerable confidence. In </span><span>The Origins of English Words,</span><span> Shipley c