✦ LIBER ✦

A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units

✍ Scribed by Janice M. Buelow; Michael Privitera; Paul Levisohn; Gregory L. Barkley

Book ID: 116979577
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 143 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 1525-5050
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.04.009

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Habitat monitoring in Europe: a descript

Habitat monitoring in Europe: a description of current practices

✍ Szabolcs Lengyel; Eszter Déri; Zoltán Varga; Roland Horváth; Béla Tóthmérész; Pi 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 428 KB

Current practice regarding invasive moni

Current practice regarding invasive monitoring in intensive care units in Finland

✍ E. Saarela; A. Kari; P. Nikki; V. Rauhala; E. Iisalo; L. Kaukinen 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 786 KB

Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monit

Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units: A survey of epilepsy professionals

✍ P.O. Shafer; J. Buelow; D.M. Ficker; M.J. Pugh; A.M. Kanner; P. Dean; P. Levisoh 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 143 KB

A consensus-based approach to patient sa

A consensus-based approach to patient safety in epilepsy monitoring units: Recommendations for preferred practices

✍ Shafer, Patricia O.; Buelow, Janice M.; Noe, Katherine; Shinnar, Ruth; Dewar, Sa 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 249 KB

Current challenges in the practice of ep

Current challenges in the practice of epilepsy surgery

✍ Joanne M. Wrench; Riki Matsumoto; Yushi Inoue; Sarah J. Wilson 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 745 KB

Free flap monitoring: A review of curren

Free flap monitoring: A review of current practice

✍ Martin B. Hirigoyen; Mark L. Urken; Hubert Weinberg 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 349 KB

## Abstract Individual techniques for the postoperative monitoring of free flaps vary considerably. In order to establish the currently preferred protocols, a survey was conducted among micro‐surgeons in North America using a mailed questionnaire. Data were received from 95 centers for the monitori