It has been conjectured by C. van Nuffelen that the chromatic number of any graph with at least one edge does not exceed the rank of its adjacency matrix. We give a counterexample, with chromatic number 32 and with an adjacency matrix of rank 29.
A counterexample to the bold conjecture
✍ Scribed by Sakuma, Tadashi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 83 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0364-9024
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A pair of vertices (x, y) of a graph G is an ω-critical pair if ω(G + xy) > ω(G), where G + xy denotes the graph obtained by adding the edge xy to G and ω(H) is the clique number of H. The ω-critical pairs are never edges in G. A maximal stable set S of G is called a forced color class of G if S meets every ω-clique of G, and ω-critical pairs within S form a connected graph. In 1993, G. Bacsó raised the following conjecture which implies the famous Strong Perfect Graph Conjecture: If G is a uniquely ω-colorable perfect graph, then G has at least one forced color class. This conjecture is called the Bold Conjecture. Here we show a simple counterexample to it.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We give a polynomial counterexample to both the Markus Yamabe conjecture and the discrete Markus Yamabe problem for all dimensions 3.
## Abstract Counterexamples are presented to the following two conjectures of Hilton: A graph which does not contain a spanning __K__~1t~ is Vl‐critical if and only if it is VC‐critical. If __G__ is a class‐two graph which contains a spanning Pl‐critical subgraph __H__ of the same chromatic index
We give a polynomial counterexample to a discrete version of the Markus᎐Yamabe conjecture and a conjecture of Deng, Meisters, and Zampieri, Ž . asserting that if F: ރ ª ރ is a polynomial map with det JF g ,\*ރ then for all g ޒ large enough, F is global analytic linearizable. These counterex