𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A Cost-Effectiveness Model for the Assessment of Educational Productivity

✍ Scribed by James S. Catterall


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Weight
187 KB
Volume
1998
Category
Article
ISSN
0271-0560

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This chapter describes and illustrates techniques used to assess productivity in colleges and universities. A brief discussion of issues surrounding productivity in higher education sets the context. The chapter then turns to definitions of cost analysis and the specific techniques of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. After that, a brief discussion of the application of cost analysis to higher education in general and the problem of educational productivity in particular is offered. Finally, the chapter illustrates the use of these techniques by drawing on a study conducted by the author and colleagues at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) in Worcester, Massachusetts, that assessed the costs and benefits of a five-year educational productivity initiative sponsored by the Davis Educational Foundation of Falmouth, Maine. A comprehensive description of this experiment appears as the case study at the end of the chapter.

The WPI Davis project supported individual faculty experimentation with instructional designs in introductory science, mathematics, engineering, and drama courses. During the experiment, eleven WPI faculty members in seven departments modified courses to include cooperative learning involving upperdivision students (peer learning assistants, or PLAs) paid to work as learning facilitators (DiBiasio and Groccia, 1995;Groccia and Miller, 1996;Demetry and Groccia, 1997;Miller and Groccia, 1997). The resulting course design, called peer assisted cooperative learning (PAC), usually brought about reductions in time devoted to faculty lecturing and mediation of student-student problems through the presence of PLAs. PAC courses also involved group projects requiring various forms of cooperative learning.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A model to predict the cost-effectivenes
✍ Afschin Gandjour πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 199 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract High costs and deficits in the care of patients with chronic diseases have triggered numerous programs to improve the quality and efficiency of treatment of chronic diseases. Decision makers need to estimate the impact of a disease management program (DMP) on long‐term costs and cost‐ef

The cost-effectiveness of remote sensing
✍ P.J. Mumby; E.P. Green; A.J. Edwards; C.D. Clark πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 136 KB

Although coastal habitat mapping is expensive, remote sensing is a more cost-effective technique than alternative field-survey methods (where effectiveness is defined as overall map accuracy). Satellite imagery is suitable for coarse detail habitat mapping where overall accuracies of c. 70% can be a

Market modeling for assessment of demand
✍ Panagiotis Papastamatiou; John Psarras πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 138 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Demand side management is nowadays considered as a fundamental step in the energy planning process. The criteria proposed for the assessment of the demand side programs (DSPs) are usually based on the balance between the marginal supply cost and the mean DSP cost. These criteria could not support th

Cost-effectiveness of new treatments for
✍ Gisela Kobelt; Linus JΓΆnsson; Anders Mattiasson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 72 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Economic analyses of interventions for chronic diseases require evaluations over a long timeframe to illustrate the benefits and costs of treatments. Clinical trials are generally short and carried out in strictly controlled conditions. They are therefore of limited value for economic evaluation aim

Assessing generalisability by location i
✍ Andrea Manca; Nigel Rice; Mark J. Sculpher; Andrew H. Briggs πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 219 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract An Erratum has been published for this article in Health Economics 14(5) 2005, 486. Cost‐effectiveness analysis (CEA) in health care is increasingly conducted alongside multicentre and multinational randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). The increased use of stochastic CEA is de