𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A corrective smoothed particle method for transient elastoplastic dynamics

✍ Scribed by J. K. Chen; J. E. Beraun; C. J. Jih


Publisher
Springer
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
193 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0178-7675

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A corrective smoothed particle method fo
✍ J. K. Chen; J. E. Beraun; T. C. Carney πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 216 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Combining the kernel estimate with the Taylor series expansion is proposed to develop a Corrective Smoothed Particle Method (CSPM). This algorithm resolves the general problem of particle de"ciency at boundaries, which is a shortcoming in Standard Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SSPH). In addition,

Parallel Transient Dynamics Simulations:
✍ Steve Plimpton; Steve Attaway; Bruce Hendrickson; Jeff Swegle; Courtenay Vaughan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 625 KB

Transient dynamics simulations are commonly used to model phenomena such as car crashes, underwater explosions, and the response of shipping containers to high-speed impacts. Physical objects in such a simulation are typically represented by Lagrangian meshes because the meshes can move and deform w

A splitting scheme for highly dissipativ
✍ S. Litvinov; M. Ellero; X.Y. Hu; N.A. Adams πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 429 KB

Smoothed particle dynamics refers to Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) when simulating macroscopic flows and to Smoothed Dissipative Particle Dynamics (SDPD) when simulating mesoscopic flows. When the considered flow is highly dissipative, this otherwise very attractive method faces a serious ti

A corrected smooth particle hydrodynamic
✍ M. X. Rodriguez-Paz; J. Bonet πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 301 KB

## Abstract This article presents the development and application of a corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics (CSPH) code to the simulation of debris flow and avalanches. The advantages of a mesh‐free method over other traditional numerical methods such as the finite element method are discussed.