✦ LIBER ✦

A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?

✍ Scribed by Lutz Bornmann; Christophe Weymuth; Hans-Dieter Daniel

Book ID: 106527331
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 227 KB
Volume: 83
Category: Article
ISSN: 0138-9130
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0011-4

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact

Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere

✍ Lutz Bornmann; Hans-Dieter Daniel 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 184 KB 👁 2 views

Erratum Re: ‘Selecting manuscripts for a

Erratum Re: ‘Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Agewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere’. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(11) 2008, 1841–1852

📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 93 KB 👁 2 views

Communications and for the statistically significant differences between the individual median values. FIG. 1. Box plots for citation counts, found in Science Citation Index and in Chemical Abstracts by citation searching for two different citation windows, of Communications accepted by AC-IE and of