๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A computerized cancer information system

โœ Scribed by M.G.E. Peterson; R.M. Rippey


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
634 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0738-3991

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Cancer information was made available via a computer to patients visiting the University of Connecticut Dental Clinics. The computer program was menu driven. An option allowed users to leave messages for the system owners. The computer program generated a log of usage, user comments and items chosen. The user could choose from the following topics: (1) general information on cancer; (2) diet, nutrition and cancer; (3) smoking; (4) the environment, occupations and cancer; and (5) physical checkups. An option to leave a message for the system operators was the option chosen least. Analysis of the usage log shows that the system was used substantially while people were waiting in the clinic and that at least three or four individuals used the system every clinic day. Such information systems can provide important information to the public. The novelty of the system and the lack of supervision did not deter public use.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A computerized documentation system for
โœ Stephan A. Schug; Detlev Zech; Stefan Grond ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 457 KB

A cancer pain management unit can benefit markedly from a well-planned documentation system for administrative and scientific purposes. This article presents the principles of such a computerized system based on relational data base programs. The described system has been used by the authors for the

Implementation of a Computerized Patient
โœ Dean F. Sittig; Nathan L. Pace; Reed M. Gardner; Eduardo Beck; Alan H. Morris ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 900 KB

## PATIENT ADVICE SYSTEM 475 ventilatory support of five patients for a total of 624 hr. During that time there were 407 decision-making opportunities. COMPAS automatically generated therapy suggestions 379 (93.1%) times and the clinical staff accepted COMPAS's recommendation in 320 (84.4%) of the