A computationally efficient approximation of Dempster-Shafer theory
β Scribed by Frans Voorbraak
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1989
- Weight
- 671 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7373
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
An often mentioned obstacle for the use of Dempster-Shafer theory for the handling of uncertainty in expert systems is the computational complexity of the theory. One cause of this complexity is the fact that in Dempster-Shafer theory the evidence is represented by a belief function which is induced by a basic probability assignment, i.e, a probability measure on the powerset of possible answers to a question, and not by a probability measure on the set of possible answers to a question, like in a Bayesian approach. In this paper, we define a Bayesian approximation of a belief function and show that combining the Bayesian approximations of belief functions is computationally less involving than combining the belief functions themselves, while in many practical applications replacing the belief functions by their Bayesian approximations will not essentially affect the result.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The computational complexity of reasoning within the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence is one of the major points of criticism this formalism has to face. To overcome this difficulty various approximation algorithms have been suggested that aim at reducing the number of focal elements in the belief
It fully formulates an interpretation of the Dempster-Shafer theory in terms of the standard semantics of modal logic. It is shown how to represent the basic probability assignment function as well as the commonality function of the Dempster-Shafer theory by modal logic and that this representation
The goal of this article is to study the connection between the Dempster-Shafter theory (DST) and probabilistic argumentation systems (PASs). By introducing a general method to translate PASs into corresponding Dempster-Shafter belief potentials, its contribution is twofold. On the one hand, the art