A computational normative theory of scientific evidence
β Scribed by David B. Sher
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 909 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0888-613X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A scientific reasoning system makes decisions using objective evidence in the form of independent experimental trials, propositional axioms, and constraints on the probabilities of events. I propose a collection of algorithms that derive probability intervals and estimate conditional probabilities from objective evidence in those forms. This reasoning system can manage uncertainty about data and rules in a rule-based expert system. I expect that the system will be particularly applicable to diagnosis and analysis in domains with a wealth of experimental evidence such as medicine. The algorithms currently apply to systems with arbitrary amounts of experimental evidence but with less than 20 variables. 1 discuss limitations of this solution and propose future directions for this research. This work can be considered a generalization of Nilsson's "'probabilistic logic" to intervals and experimental observations.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Tessem, B., Approximations for efficient computation in the theory of evidence (Research Note), Artificial Intelligence 61 ( 1993 ) 315-329. The theory of evidence has become a widely used method for handling uncertainty in intelligent systems. The method has, however, an efficiency problem. To sol