𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A comparison of various types of fixation devices for protection of the posterior cruciate ligament against a posterior drawer force

✍ Scribed by Clifton B. O'Meara; Dr. Allan F. Tencer; Frank M. Ivey Jr.; Peggy Woodard


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Weight
441 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We compared four different fixation devices to determine which offers the greatest relative protection to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) against elongation with an applied posterior drawer force. We designed a system to monitor and record the change in distance between an approximate origin and insertion of the PCL as known forces were applied posteriorly to the tibia with the femur fixed. Six fresh cadaver knees were used in this investigative series. They were first tested with the PCL intact, then with the PCL transected, and then with the various fixation devices applied. After comparing the results with transarticular pins and quadrilateral and anterior half-frame external fixators, we found that transarticular fixation offers significantly greater protection to the PCL. This study may prove to be helpful to the orthopaedist when selecting ancillary fixation for posterior cruciate repair or reconstruction.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Does a tensioning device pinned to the t
✍ Dustin M. Thompson; M.L. Hull; S.M. Howell 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 236 KB

Devices that are pinned to the tibia to tension an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft produce joint reaction loads that in turn can affect the maintenance of graft initial tension after tibial fixation and hence knee anterior-posterior (AP) load-displacement. However, the effect of these devices