𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A Comparison of Vaginal vs. Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor–Double Blind Randomized Trial

✍ Scribed by Promila Jindal; Kumkum Avasthi; Maninder Kaur

Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
376 KB
Volume
61
Category
Article
ISSN
0971-9202

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A double-blind randomized trial of two d
A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction
✍ Makbib Diro; Abdallah Adra; Jerry M. Gilles; Anwar Nassar; Alfredo Rodriguez; Sh 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 70 KB

## Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Methods: Patients who fulfilled the study criteria were randomized to received misoprostol 25 µg or 50 µg intravaginally every 3 h for

Oral brivudin vs. intravenous acyclovir
Oral brivudin vs. intravenous acyclovir in the treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompromised patients: A randomized double-blind trial
✍ Professor Peter Wutzler; Eric De Clercq; Klaus Wutke; Inge Färber 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 590 KB

## Abstract The efficacy of oral brivudin vs. intravenous acyclovir was compared in a randomized multicentered study under double‐blind conditions using the double‐dummy technique. Forty‐eight patients with a herpes zoster rash less than 72 hours in duration were entered in the study. Brivudin was