𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A comparison of two methods of estimating a common risk difference in a stratified analysis of a multicenter clinical trial

✍ Scribed by Thomas W. O'Gorman; Robert F. Woolson; Michael P. Jones

Book ID
113297930
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
897 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
0197-2456

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

A comparison of various estimators of a
A comparison of various estimators of a treatment difference for a multi-centre clinical trial
✍ B. Jones; D. Teather; J. Wang; J. A. Lewis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 96 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

When a clinical trial is conducted at more than one centre it is likely that the true treatment effect will not be identical at each centre. In other words there will be some degree of treatment-by-centre interaction. A number of alternative approaches for dealing with this have been suggested in th

Testing the significance of a common ris
Testing the significance of a common risk difference in meta-analysis
✍ Julio SΓ‘nchez-Meca; Fulgencio Marı́n-Martı́nez πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 112 KB

Using the Monte Carlo simulation, we estimated the statistical power and Type I error rates of ΓΏve procedures for testing the signiΓΏcance of a common risk di erence in a set of independent 2 Γ— 2 tables. It was found that the unweighted procedure for testing the signiΓΏcance of a common risk di erence