๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening

โœ Scribed by David K Whynes; Emma Frew; Jane L Wolstenholme


Book ID
117359387
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
125 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0167-6296

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of alternative contingent v
โœ M. Christie ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 171 KB

Attempts to evaluate the economic benefits associated with complex environmental policies, using the contingent valuation (CV) method, have been dogged by controversy. In particular, debate has centred on the influence of embedding and related effects on the validity of CV willingness-to-pay (WTP) e