A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of the quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD), coupled cluster (CCSD), and Brueckner coupled cluster (BCCD) methods, Chem. Phys. Lctters 190 (1992) 1.
A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of the quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD), coupled cluster (CCSD), and Brueckner coupled cluster (BCCD) methods
β Scribed by Claudia Hampel; Kirk A. Peterson; Hans-Joachim Werner
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 1022 KB
- Volume
- 190
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2614
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The coupled-cluster method restricted to single and double excitations from a closed-shell reference function (CCSD) and the corresponding quadratic configuration interaction method (QCISD) are formulated in terms of quantities which can be computed directly from the two-electron integrals in A0 basis. A simple yet effective method to accelerate convergence in Brueckner coupled-cluster (BCCD) calculations is also described. Using this procedure BCCD calculations require no more effort than CCSD calculations. In order to compare the accuracy of all three methods potential energy functions and spectroscopic constants have been calculated for NS, CO, F2, and HF using large basis sets.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Potential energy curves are calculated for O;, 0,, and 0: at the CCSD, QCISD, CCSD(T), and QCISD(T) levels of theory using aug-cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets with electron correlation built onto inversion symmetry constrained and relaxed UHF wave functions. The spectroscopic constant Y,, we, w,x