In the present experiments, the effects of a wide range of doses of d-amphetamine and apomorphine were studied on investigatory behavior in an automated eight-hole box. Amphetamine (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 mg/kg) increased frequency and total duration of responses, and decreased mean duratio
A comparison of the effects of amphetamine, apomorphine and white noise on response switching in the rat
โ Scribed by J. L. Evenden; S. J. Doggett
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 594 KB
- Volume
- 97
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0033-3158
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The effects of d-amphetamine, apomorphine and white noise on response switching in the rat were examined using a schedule of reinforcement which resulted in the subjects displaying a range of different probabilities of switching. The procedure was analogous to the use of a fixed interval schedule of reinforcement for examining the ratedependent effects of drugs, d-Amphetamine (0.4-4.0 mg/kg) increased response switching in a manner dependent both upon the dose of drug and the baseline probability of switching. Apomorphine (0.0i-0.3 mg/kg) increased switching in a manner which depended upon dose but which was independent of the baseline probability of switching. Neither drug increased response rate, although both drugs reduced response rate at the highest doses. In contrast, continuous white noise (85-105 dB) increased response rate without affecting switching. The results indicate that different activating stimuli may have qualitatively different effects on behaviour.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A test of attentional switching was devised for the rat in which it obtained sucrose reinforcement by an appropriate nose-poke response that discriminated which of two visual events terminated first, in a specially designed chamber. The effect of mesolimbic dopamine depletion (to 20% of control valu
Apomorphine, d-amphetamine, chlorpromazine and dopamine, added to the aquarium water, were tested for their effects on the aggressive responses of isolated fish to mirrors and to models, compared with the responses of the same fish as non-treated controls tested at the start of, in the middle, and a