๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparison of self-delivered consequences and desensitization in the treatment of fear of rats

โœ Scribed by Alan M. Gross; T. A. Brigham


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1979
Tongue
English
Weight
564 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Exposed 52 rat phobic Ss to either group desensitization, self-delivered consequences imagined exposure, self-delivered consequences in-vivo exposure, or no treatment. Self-delivered consequences Ss conducted the treatment on their own and self-delivered preselected reinforcers contingent upon performance of the treatment exercises. All treatment groups improved significantly more than the no-treatment control group. The self-delivered consequences imagined exposure and the group desensitization treatments were equally effective. The self-delivered consequences in-vivo exposure treatment was significantly more effective than the self-delivered consequences imagined exposure and group desensitization treatments. The applicability of self-management techniques t o the treatment of fear responses to specific stimuli and an extinction explanation of the effectiveness of systematic desensitization are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Assimilation and contrast in social comp
โœ Ulrich Kรผhnen; Bettina Hannover ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 133 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

We extended existing research about self-construal activation to the study of social comparisons, speciยฎcally to selfยฑother similarity ratings. Independent self-knowledge substantiates the notion of dissimilarity, whereas interdependent self-knowledge implies similarity with others. Therefore, perce

A further investigation of the developme
โœ Pamela S. Hunt ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 153 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This series of experiments was designed to reexamine the ontogenetic emergence of the fear-potentiated startle response in rats. Previous results (Hunt, Richardson, & Campbell, 1994) indicated that potentiated startle to a light conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with an acoustic unconditioned stimulu