𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A comparison of magnetic and electrical stimulation of spinal nerves

✍ Scribed by B. A. Evans; J. R. Daube; W. J. Litchy


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
450 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Transient improvement of psychogenic (pr
✍ Lars Wojtecki; Stefan Groiss; Dag Scherfeld; Philipp Albrecht; Bettina Pollok; S πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 207 KB

To note, none of the other occasionally tested protocols (mono polar STIM or 50/70/130 Hz or even 4-4.5 V) provided better results. b Better turning in bed, nighttime, with respect to PPTg-OFF condition. c Improved rigidity (left arms) and slightly improved finger tapping, bilaterally, with respects

Stimulation of peripheral nerves using a
✍ Ferdinand Binkofski; Joseph Classen; Reiner Benecke πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 187 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Magnetic nerve stimulation (MNS) using a novel figure-8 magnetic coil was compared with conventional electric nerve stimulation (ENS) in normal subjects and in patients with disorders of the peripheral nervous system. In contrast to previously tested coils, the virtual cathode of the novel coil was

Comparison of magnetic coil and needle-e
✍ Prof. Cumhur Ertekin; Reza S. Nejat; Hadiye Şirin; Deniz SelΓ§uki; NilgΓΌn AraΓ§; M πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 117 KB

Lumbosacral roots could be tested either by means of magnetic coil stimulation\* or electrically using needle electrode inserted to the laminar level.' We studied 15 normal subjects and 20 patients with lumbosacral root disorders to compare these stimulation techniques. The magnetic stimulator with