๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparison of Lisp and Prolog

โœ Scribed by G.J. Postma; B.G.M. Vandeginste; C.J.G. van Halen; G. Kateman


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
541 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
0165-9936

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of contrasting Prolog trace o
โœ MUKESH J. PATEL; BENEDICT DU BOULAY; CHRIS TAYLOR ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 504 KB

This paper reports on a comparative study of three Prolog trace packages. Forty-three students of an introductory Prolog course solved five different Prolog programming problems in each of three different conditions (using isomorphic problem variants to disguise recurring tasks). Each of the three c

New midrange computer and version of Lis
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 111 KB

A CAD package for the design of printed circuit boards (PCBs) has been developed by CAD Software Inc. It is called Pads-PCB and runs on IBM PC ATs or XTs. Pads-PCB can use multiple size grids. Boards of area 32 ร— 32 in and with up to 30 layers can be designed. Surface mounted devices are supported

A constructive view of PROLOG
โœ Damjan Bojadziev ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 442 KB

A constructive rationalization of PROLOG is presented, covering the logical form of definite clause programs and the role of negative (goal) clauses. This view is developed from the idea, taken from set theory, that a constructive theory can be obtained if classical reasoning is confined to a constr

A logical reconstruction of Prolog II
โœ M.H. van Emden; J.W. Lloyd ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 447 KB
A pragmatic reconstruction of ฮปProlog
โœ Catherine Belleannรฉe; Pascal Brisset; Olivier Ridoux ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 294 KB

kProlog is a logic programming language in which hereditary Harrop formulas generalize Horn formulas, and simply typed k-terms generalize Prolog terms. One may wonder if these extensions are simultaneously required, and if useful subsets of kProlog can be deยฎned, at least for pedagogical purposes. W