A comparison of laparoscopic and open hernia repair as a day surgical procedure

✍ Scribed by G. J. Maddern; G. Rudkin; J. R. Bessell; P. Devitt; L. Ponte

• Publisher: Springer
• Year: 1994
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 455 KB
• Volume: 8
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0930-2794
• DOI: 10.1007/bf00187345

✦ Synopsis

To evaluate the merits of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) compared to conventional open hernia repair (OHR) a randomized study has been conducted.

All patients were day surgical cases, of which 44 were randomized to a standardized OHR under local anesthetic (LA) and 42 to an LHR under general anesthesia (GA). Fifteen LHR patients had bilateral repairs.

Operative time for OHR was 30.5 min, for unilateral LHR 35 min, and for bilateral LHR 60 min. OHR patients were discharged after a median of 134.5 min, which was significantly shorter than LHR patients, whose median discharge was 225 min (P < 0.01). Pain scores, activity levels, analgesia requirements, and time taken to return to work were not significantly different following surgery in either group (P < 0.05). There have been two recurrent hernias and one small bowel obstruction in the LHR group.

We conclude that both repairs can be successfully performed as day surgical procedures. The added cost of LHR at this stage does not warrant its widespread use in unilateral hernia repairs. Which procedure is adopted should be individualized; however, patients with bilateral hernias on presentation can be successfully managed as day cases, obviating the need for hospitalization or two operations.