✦ LIBER ✦

A Comparison of Involved Field vs. Involved Node Radiation Therapy in the Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Population: Reduction in Second Malignancy Risk

✍ Scribed by Ballas, L.; Wolden, S.L.; Shuryak, I.; Shah, J.N.; Balmir, B.; Chao, K.S.; Brenner, D.J.

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A Comparison of Involved-Field Radiation

✍ Huynh-Le, M.; Walker, A.; Wharam, M.; Paz Priel, I.; Terezakis, S. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB

46 Significant reduction of second breas

✍ A.R. Filippi; P. Ciammella; C. Fiandra; A. Botticella; R. Ragona; U. Vitolo; A. 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 43 KB

22 Estimated reduction in secondary brea

✍ D. Hodgson; T. Xu; E-S. Koh; T.H. Tran; M. Heydarian; D.J. Brenner; R. Sachs; J. 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB

A Comparison of Traditional Versus Respo

✍ Wilson, J.E.; South, M.; Teh, B.; Butler, B.; Paulino, A. 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 52 KB

Dosimetric Comparison of Involved-Field

✍ David L. Andolino; Ted Hoene; Lu Xiao; Jeffrey Buchsbaum; Andrew L. Chang 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 337 KB

Response to “Role of FDG-PET in the Defi

✍ Jianhua Wang; Mei Shi 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 43 KB