The most important prognostic factor in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is tumor grade. Since most grading methods are subject to the interpretation of the individual pathologist, there is a need for objective criteria such as DNA ploidy and karyotype, which are of prognostic value in several types of ma
β¦ LIBER β¦
A comparison of DNA-ploidy and karyotype of soft tissue sarcomas
β Scribed by E. van den Berg; W.M. Molenaar; B. de Jong; A. Dam; J. Wiersema; A.P. Verstraete
- Book ID
- 119105224
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 91 KB
- Volume
- 52
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0165-4608
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Clinical outcome of patients with previo
β
Boudewijn E.C. Plaat; Friso L.H. Muntinghe; Willemina M. Molenaar; Harald J. Hoe
π
Article
π
1997
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
French
β 94 KB
π 2 views
Comparison of DNA and karyotype ploidy i
β
S. PyrhΓΆnen; M. Tiainen; J. Rautonen; L. Tammilehto; A. Laasonen; K. Mattson; S.
π
Article
π
1992
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 529 KB
Flow cytometry DNA ploidy analysis in ch
β
Goshen, Y.; Yaniv, I.; Shmilovitz, M.; Luria, D.; Kidron, D.; Zaizov, R.
π
Article
π
1993
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 158 KB
DNA ploidy in soft tissue sarcoma: Compa
β
Karsten E. DreinhΓΆfer; Bo Baldetorp; MΓ₯ns Γ
kerman; MΓ₯rten FernΓΆ; Anders Rydholm;
π
Article
π
2002
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 108 KB
## Abstract In soft tissue sarcoma, the prognostic importance of DNA ploidy status is limited. One possible explanation may be technical; small nondiploid stemlines will be diluted in relation to the presence of normal diploid cells and may not be detected by flow cytometry (FCM). We assessed DNA p
Soft tissue sarcomas in adults and child
β
Walter Lawrence Jr.
π
Article
π
1994
π
American Cancer Society
π
English
β 32 KB
DNA ploidy and proliferative activity (S
β
Niggli, FK; Powell, JE; Parkes, SE; Ward, K; Raafat, F; Mann, JR; Stevens, MCG
π
Article
π
1994
π
Nature Publishing Group
π
English
β 956 KB