𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A comparison of differential reinforcement and noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of a child's multiply controlled problem behavior

✍ Scribed by Tiffany Kodak; Raymond G. Miltenberger; Cathryn Romaniuk


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
87 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
1072-0847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of noncontingent reinforcem
✍ David A. Wilder; Robin Draper; W. L. Williams; Thomas S. Higbee πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 136 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Modified versions of three popular nonaversive treatments for rumination in a person with profound developmental delay were evaluated using an alternating treatments design (ATD) as a component of an ABAB design. Results showed that the most effective intervention involved noncontingent feeding ever

Response Interruption and Differential R
✍ Louis P. Hagopian; Melissa L. GonzΓ‘lez; Tessa Taylor Rivet; Mandy Triggs; Seth B πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 313 KB

Pica displayed by two individuals with autism was decreased by a treatment involving differential reinforcement and response interruption that altered the chain of behavior involved in pica (i.e., picking up items and placing them in the mouth). The treatment involved establishing prompts to β€˜clean‐

Differential reinforcement of high rate
✍ Kelli M. Girolami; SungWoo Kahng; Kellie A. Hilker; Peter A. Girolami πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 78 KB

## Abstract Although numerous studies have examined treatments for increasing food consumption among children with pediatric feeding disorders, very few have examined treatment of other mealtime‐related difficulties. One such problem is a slow pace of self‐feeding, which can lead to caregivers fail

Conjugate reinforcement: a brief review
✍ John T. Rapp πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 144 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Procedures involving conjugate reinforcement have been used extensively by researchers in developmental psychology, but sparingly by behavior analysts. Based on this trend, this paper calls for a re‐examination of conjugate reinforcement as a tool for analyzing automatically reinforced