✦ LIBER ✦

A comparison of crystal–melt interfacial free energies using different Al potentials

✍ Scribed by James R. Morris; M.I. Mendelev; D.J. Srolovitz

Book ID: 116670524
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 314 KB
Volume: 353
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-3093
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.05.116

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Direct calculation of the crystal–melt i

Direct calculation of the crystal–melt interfacial free energies for continuous potentials: Application to the Lennard-Jones system

✍ Davidchack, Ruslan L.; Laird, Brian B. 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 American Institute of Physics 🌐 English ⚖ 403 KB

Crystal-melt interfacial free energies i

Crystal-melt interfacial free energies in hcp metals: A molecular dynamics study of Mg

✍ Sun, D. Y.; Mendelev, M. I.; Becker, C. A.; Kudin, K.; Haxhimali, Tomorr; Asta, 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 The American Physical Society 🌐 English ⚖ 230 KB

Measurement of anisotropy of crystal-mel

Measurement of anisotropy of crystal-melt interfacial energy for a binary Al–Cu alloy

✍ Shan Liu; R.E. Napolitano; R. Trivedi 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 240 KB

A comparison of crystal growth kinetics

A comparison of crystal growth kinetics by use of chemical potential difference and concentration difference

✍ Han Soo Na; Sae Joong Oh 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 829 KB

A molecular dynamics simulation study of

A molecular dynamics simulation study of the crystal–melt interfacial free energy and its anisotropy in the Cu–Ag–Au ternary system

✍ A.A. Potter; J.J. Hoyt 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 300 KB

04/01936 The potential of solar electric

04/01936 The potential of solar electric power for meeting future US energy needs: a comparison of projections of solar electric energy generation and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge oil production: Byrne, J. et al. Energy Policy, 2004, 32, (2), 289–297

📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 156 KB

07 Altemative energy sources (solar energy) determined. Surface areas of between 770 and 879 m 2 g 1 were achieved. The yield of activated carbon was mostly less than 20 wt% of the original biomass. The five biomass samples were also pyrolysed in a thermogravimetric analyser. The thermal degradation