𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A comparison of contact angle interpretations

✍ Scribed by William R Good

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1973
Tongue
English
Weight
548 KB
Volume
44
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9797

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Model for Interpretation and Correlation
Model for Interpretation and Correlation of Contact Angle Measurements
✍ Faruk Civan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 109 KB

ARTICLE NO. CS974991 NOTE Model for Interpretation and Correlation of Contact Angle Measurements cos u 0 Γ… mq 0 / a, [4] An improved formulation relating the contact angle to the surcos u Ο± Γ… mq Ο± / a. [5] face coverage is presented and verified. The Ohmi et al. data (Particle Sci. Technol. 7, 229,

A New Interpretation of Contact Angle Va
A New Interpretation of Contact Angle Variations in View of a Recent Analysis of Immersion Calorimetry
✍ Jean Marc Douillard; Vincent MΓ©dout-MarΓ¨re πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 67 KB

The values of the contact angles of different liquids on the same solid are classically interpreted by theories assuming that the vapor adsorption is negligible on solids presenting contact angles. This implies that the solid may be defined by a certain tension, called "critical tension", which is n

The Interpretation of Dynamic Contact An
The Interpretation of Dynamic Contact Angles Measured by the Wilhelmy Plate Method
✍ E. RamΓ© πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 187 KB

We present an analysis for properly interpreting apparent dynamic contact angles measured using the Wilhelmy plate method at low capillary numbers, Ca. This analysis removes the ambiguity in current dynamic measurements which interpret data with the same formula as static measurements. We properly a