✦ LIBER ✦

A comparison of an immunological faecal occult blood test Fecatwin sensitive/FECA EIA with Haemoccult in population screening for colorectal cancer

✍ Scribed by Armitage, N; Hardcastle, J D; Amar, S S; Balfour, T W; Haynes, J; James, P D

Book ID: 109835625
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Year: 1985
Tongue: English
Weight: 654 KB
Volume: 51
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-0920
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1985.124

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Screening for colorectal cancer with an

Screening for colorectal cancer with an immunological faecal occult blood test: 2-Year follow-up

✍ Mr M. H. E. Robinson; C. G. Marks; P. A. Farrands; K. Bostock; J. D. Hardcastle 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 179 KB 👁 2 views

Screening for colorectal cancer using a

Screening for colorectal cancer using a quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a feasibility study in an Asian population

✍ W.-P. Fu; M.-H. Kam; W.-M. Ling; S.-F. Ong; N. Suzannah; Kong-Weng Eu 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 202 KB

Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal oc

Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test with automated reading in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average-risk population

✍ Guy D. Launoy; Hughes J. Bertrand; Celia Berchi; Vincent Y. Talbourdet; Anne Val 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 76 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Colorectal cancer screening is a high public health priority in all industrialized countries. However, the low sensitivity of the common guaiac screening test (HemoccultII) makes practitioners and public health decision makers reluctant to set up a national screening program. In recent

Erratum to: Launoy et al. “Evaluation of

Erratum to: Launoy et al. “Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test with automated reading in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average-risk population.” Int J Cancer 2005; 115:493–496.

📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 20 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in International Journal of Cancer (2005) 115(3) 493–496 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20921