This work compares four different extraction techniques solid-phase Ž . Ž . extraction SPE , supercritical fluid extraction SFE , solid-phase extraction fol-Ž . lowed by supercritical fluid extraction SPErSFE , and liquid᎐liquid extraction Ž .x Ž . LLE for the extraction of 16 polycyclic aromatic h
A comparison between solid phase extraction and supercritical fluid extraction for the determination of fluconazole from animal feed
✍ Scribed by S. Khundker; J.R. Dean; P. Jones
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 464 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0731-7085
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) coupled “off‐line” with HPLC analysis has been applied to pharmaceutical analysis: two different matrixes (rodent and dog feed) were spiked with compounds under investigation in pharmacological studies in order to study the supercritical extraction o
## Abstract The enrichment of semi‐volatile compounds from water using solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) was compared. The investigations (analysis of PAHs and organochlorine compounds) were performed to compare SPME‐GC/MS and SBSE‐thermodesorption‐GC/MS. Ad
## Abstract Dry extracts of the aerial parts of __Epimedium koreanum__ were quantified by HPLC and high performance TLC (HPTLC). A gradient HPLC method was used for the quantification of the prenylflavone glycoside icariin at 270 nm. A direct HPTLC assay was developed for the determination of icari