๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies

โœ Scribed by Reuven Karni; Pedro Sanchez; V. M. Rao Tummala


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
804 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0040-5833

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Three "real life" cases are considered in this paper to apply and compare the rankings obtained by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and other Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques such as Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), ELECTRE and Weighted Linear Assignment Method (WLAM). The results indicated that the AHP, SAW, and ELECTRE rankings do not differ significantly, however, the WLAM tends to exhibit more disagreement. However, because of the limited nature of this study, we do not suggest this as a general conclusion.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Comparative Study of Three Mapping Met
โœ X. Z. Zhang; A. B. Rad; Y. K. Wong; G. Q. Huang; Y. L. Ip; K. M. Chow ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 264 KB
Toward a methodology for moral decision
โœ Thomasine Kushner; Raymond A. Belliotti; Donald Buckner ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 989 KB

The failure of medical codes to provide adequate guidance for physicians' moral dilemmas points to the fact that some rules of analysis, informed by moral theory, are needed to assist in resolving perplexing ethical problems occurring with increasing frequency as medical technology advances. Initial