A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies
โ Scribed by Reuven Karni; Pedro Sanchez; V. M. Rao Tummala
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 804 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0040-5833
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Three "real life" cases are considered in this paper to apply and compare the rankings obtained by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and other Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques such as Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), ELECTRE and Weighted Linear Assignment Method (WLAM). The results indicated that the AHP, SAW, and ELECTRE rankings do not differ significantly, however, the WLAM tends to exhibit more disagreement. However, because of the limited nature of this study, we do not suggest this as a general conclusion.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The failure of medical codes to provide adequate guidance for physicians' moral dilemmas points to the fact that some rules of analysis, informed by moral theory, are needed to assist in resolving perplexing ethical problems occurring with increasing frequency as medical technology advances. Initial