## Abstract Hybrid composites, based on poly(ether sulfone) (PES) and glass fiber–reinforced copolyester liquid crystalline polymer (gLCP) up to 40% gLCP, were obtained by injection molding: these polymers were immiscible. Despite its higher viscosity, the gLCP acted as a processing aid for PES. Th
A comparative study of in-situ composite fibers reinforced with different rigid liquid crystalline polymers
✍ Scribed by Lihua Pan; Borun Liang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 696 KB
- Volume
- 70
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-8995
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and 2 thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers (LCPs) with different chain rigidity were blended to make in-situ composite fibers on a conventional melt spinning equipment. The addition of the LCP-1 (60PHB-PET) with a less rigid chain has been found to lower the orientation of the as-spun fibers while the LCP-2 (VectraA900) with whole aromatic rigid chain has a reverse effect, as evidenced from the birefringence results. Both kinds of composite fibers with 5 wt % LCP have a good drawability. There is a diffraction peak characteristic of intermolecular packing of LCP on the wide-angle X-ray diffraction curve for the as-spun fibers containing LCP-2 but not the case for LCP-1. The morphology formed during elongational flow is highly dependent on the composition and rigidity of LCP. For the dispersed phases of LCP-1, it is relatively difficult to be elongated, whereas LCP-2 dispersed phases will be easily deformed into fibrils during melt spinning. The mechanical properties of the blend fibers containing the LCP-1 component are inferior to those containing the LCP-2 component. For the fibers with discontinuous fibril morphology, a Halpin-Tsai equation could well be used to describe the elastic modulus of in-situ composite fiber with LCP-2.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES