๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FOUR METHODS FOR ANALYSING REPEATED MEASURES DATA

โœ Scribed by ORLY MANOR; JEREMY D. KARK

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
964 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6715

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis

This paper compares four alternative statistical methods for the analysis of repeated measures data. The data set involves fatty acid composition of red blood cell membrane examined after acute MI and is characterized by a moderate sample size, unbalanced repeated measures and high within-individual correlations. Two methods are based on individual curve fitting and two on the random effects model. Results yielded by the four methods differed. The advantages and disadvantages of the methods are discussed. Assumptions required for the valid application of these methods are tested.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Analysing repeated measurements data: a
Analysing repeated measurements data: a practical comparison of methods
โœ Rumana Z. Omar; Eileen M. Wright; Rebecca M. Turner; Simon G. Thompson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 149 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

A variety of methods are available for analysing repeated measurements data where the outcome is continuous. However, there is little information on how established methods, such as summary statistics and repeated measures analysis of variance (RMAOV), compare in practice with methods that have beco

Group sequential analyses for the mean f
Group sequential analyses for the mean function of a repeated measure process
โœ X. Joan Hu; Stephen W. Lagakos ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 147 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

In many clinical trials, treatment e$cacy is based upon response to a biological marker that is measured repeatedly during the course of follow-up. However, in some of these trials it is not clear, a priori, how treatment e!ects on the marker may manifest themselves or what kinds of e!ects are clini

A comparative study of uncertainty metho
A comparative study of uncertainty methods for legal reasoning
โœ David Woerner; Samir Armaly; Alley Butler; David Fischer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 192 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This paper is based on the premise that legal reasoning involves an evaluation of facts, principles, and legal precedent that are inexact, and uncertainty-based methods represent a useful approach for modeling this type of reasoning. By applying three different uncertainty-based methods to the same