## Abstract ## BACKGROUND This study was conducted to evaluate a self‐administered questionnaire developed to measure the needs experienced by men diagnosed with prostate carcinoma (the Prostate Cancer Needs Questionnaire [PCNQv1.1]). The PCNQv1.1 was constructed in two parts. Part 1 measures the
A community needs assessment: the care needs assessment pack for dementia (CarenapD)—its development, reliability and validity
✍ Scribed by Gregor McWalter; Hugh Toner; Alison McWalter; Jenny Eastwood; Mary Marshall; Tony Turvey
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 154 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Objective:
To develop and evaluate a multidisciplinary needs assessment tool for people with dementia living in the community and their carers.
Design:
The measure was developed through applying a theory of need, generating content, consultation with potential users and refinement and evaluation. validity was established incrementally through the development process.
Setting:
The development and evaluation was conducted in a variety of settings, including multidisciplinary dementia community care teams, social work departments, day hospitals, and inpatient and residential care.
Patients:
The evaluation included community patients with a formal diagnosis of dementia (n = 34) and consultation with a multidisciplinary group of potential users (n = 23). the development process included inpatients with a formal diagnosis of dementia (n = 157) and consultation with potential users (n = 170) from a range of professions including both health and social care.
Measures:
Interrater reliability was assessed using the kappa statistic. social validity was estimated using a measure developed for this purpose as part of the development process.
Results:
The evaluation of interrater reliability demonstrated that three-quarters of assessors agreed on at least 85% of items in the carenapd. the kappa statistic demonstrated that agreement for 76.2% of items in the carenapd was 'good' or better (ie kappa >0.75), for 12.4% of items it was 'fair' or 'moderate' (ie kappa 0.35-0.60) and for the remaining 12 (11.4%) items for which kappa could not be calculated there was low intra-item variance and high agreement (>90%). there was good evidence for social validity.
Conclusions:
The carenapd is a reliable and valid multidisciplinary assessment of need for people with dementia living in the community and their carers.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES