𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A combined urodynamic and electrophysiological study of diabetic cystopathy

✍ Scribed by Christina-Anastasia Rapidi; Nikos Karandreas; Charilaos Katsifotis; Marianna Benroubi; Konstantina Petropoulou; Charalambos Theodorou


Book ID
102539219
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
185 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
0733-2467

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study is to compare urodynamics and electrophysiological studies in the diagnosis of diabetic cystopathy.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective study are included twenty six patients with diabetes mellitus diagnosed at least since 5 years; 17 patients with diabetes type II and 9 with type I. They were divided in two groups in respect to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and signs suggestive of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) according to the ICS standardization. Patients with LUTS/LUTD were included in Group A and patients without LUTS/LUTD in Group B. Patients underwent different studies: urodynamic, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) of tibial and pudendal nerves, bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR), bulbocavernosus muscles' electromyography and motor evoked potentials after transcranial magnetic stimulation to indirectly investigate bladder's innervation.

Results

Abnormal urodynamics were found in 13 patients of group A (92.9%) and in 5 of group B (47.1%). This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.009). Abnormally prolonged latency of P40 of tibial SSEP was found in 11 patients of group A (78.6%) and in 4 of group B (33.3%) and this difference was also statistically significant (P = 0.04). Differences between the two groups concerning: i) peripheral polyneuropathy; ii) pudendal SSEP, iii) dysfunction of central nervous system and iv) abnormal BCR were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

The study of tibial SSEP is an easily performed test and it is well correlated to abnormal urodynamics in diabetic patients with and without LUTD/LUTS. Neurourol. Urodynam. Β© 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of electrophysiological tes
✍ Carlos Pastore; Virginia Izura; Emilio Geijo-Barrientos; Jose-Ramon Dominguez πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 143 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Clinical criteria and several electrophysiological parameters for detecting nerve damage were compared in 99 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2. Abnormal results were found in sural/radial amplitude ratio (51%), minimal F-wave latency of the tibial nerve (36.4%), sensory conduction ve